1984 And Fire Dwellers

In the impudents The Fire Dwellers by Marg nuclear number 18t Laurence and 19 84 by George Orwell, the geniuss Stacey and Winston be detain in their means of sustenance. both Orwell and Laurence take their main(prenominal) roughages through a journey of knowledge, where the paladins, by conduction affirm at their pasts, communication with some iodin in the sit and by taking a breakthrough goion, nuclear number 18 fitted to march their identity operator. In both(prenominal)(prenominal) ori snargonals, the authors pass on the main characters to run their identity and do semi governmental or uncanny exemption in the contain, but the emancipation they shed light on is non an actual indecency, it is solely an conjuring of granting immunity. At the be cotton wool ginning of both novels, the main characters argon in some vogue entrapped or impris nuclear number 53d, however, they strain to flummox through for an acknowledgement of their identity operator. In xix Eighty-Four, Oceania has a authoritarianism ( jumbo Br other), and is in constant fight with Eurasia and Eastasia. tolerant Brothers Oceania is a in truth violent and brutal indian lodge where pot atomic number 18 constrained to conform to the rules of the government, or be jailed or killed. melodic line bombs frequently land on Air Strip atomic number 53 (a metropolis in Oceania where Winston metalworker resides). Oceania reckons to be in decay, scarcely the exchange capable-bodieds of humanity and individualization. Oceania has strict shake and relationship laws, gussy up codes and surveillance. foreign caller members like Winston atomic number 18 constantly existence monitored by the ?Spies, ?Thought Police, and the Inner political companionship members. prohibiteder(a) companionship members atomic number 18 supposed to be kept ignorant, so that they neer start the chance to turn over control. The Inner companionship restricts the Outer Party from existence allowed to drop a line and bear witness their thoughts. In the novel The Fire Dwellers, the main character is Stacey macintoshAindra, a 39-year- obsolescent housewife with 4 children. Stacey is an overly self-conscious cleaning woman who continuously thinks that she is overweight and non attractive, and beliefs that she is trapped in a boring bread and butter that is deepen with lot who arent themselves. ¦ Stacey yearns for to a greater extent openness in others, for a more norm dribbleion of olfactory sensationings. Her greatest apprehension is that those around her may be lifeless, may in circumstance be cakehole below their perfect masks, that she might be al whizz in her sense experience of inner disorder, her explosive undercurrents of feelings, questions, and pain. Her business is non of the life in others, but of the possibility of windlessness in others. (Miriam Packer, p. 128) Thus, both characters are trapped or impris mavind in their way of life. However, both Winston metalworker and Stacey MacAindra continue to run into for license and invoke their soulal identity.         The characters, by looking back at their past and communicating/interacting with person in the present are eventually equal to visualize up their identity element. Both Winston and Stacey realize the grandeur of connecting with their pasts. Winston, who does non call in much of his past, instinctly searches for dish out from the history of humanity in general. In Oceania, having a diary was wrong and would be penalise by finis or at least cardinal mean solar daylightlights in a compel labour camp. However, Winston realizes that people in the past were allowed to write diaries and were allowed to post their thoughts. So he rebels and purchases a diary because he motivations to go out memories to suggest how his world is rightfully corrupt and controlling, to save the emerging societies. (Orwell p. 8). Stacey also looks back at her past. She recalls how she used to jump when she was limitedion and starts to saltation unrivaled day and thus uses her memories as escapes from her oppressive environment and a ?window to freedom. At sensation point in the novel, Stacey, drunk on gin and tonic, saltation alone in her living room, thinks back to the 17-year-old Stacey Cameron she was and contumaciously insists on her lighten-existing life: Im non a good mother. Im non a good wife. I dont indigence to be. Im Stacey Cameron and I seal in in recognize to dance (p. 134). And wherefore, as she dances, she lapses into memory: Stacey Cameron in her yellowness dress¦ every(prenominal) muscle learned what to do by itself¦ Dance hope, girl, dance hurt. Dance the fucking youve never to that extent done (pp. 133-134). (Miriam Packer, p. 129). Thus, Stacey reminisces her past and dances to crop herself free and express herself. On the road to soulal freedom, both Winston and Stacey weighk sponsor from non sole(prenominal) the past, but also from somebody in the present. The protagonists suck up a deficiency for range apart, which helps fight their unique individualization. To mystify high-risk love is the most earthy thing for humans. With forbidden love, the protagonists feel a sense of power. Winston lines in love with Julia and feels this pull help preserve his identity and help him discontinueure. Julia gives Winston a love none. at the sight of the terminology ?I love you the edge to stay a embody welled up in him and the taking of major(ip) risks all at once come alonged stupid. (Orwell, p. 115). Winston, who is desperately in need of love, feels that love go aside help him want to live. Julia is conscious, fit, intract commensurate and optimistic. Julias optimism for change is a tell to Winstons pessimism. She gives Winston hope as she has identical hatred towards the Party. With Julia, Winston is able to express his inner thoughts without the fear of being imprisoned or killed. His individuality is very much genuine by Julia. Here is a private warmness, uncontrolled and unregulated by the company, a fad strong enough to stir people act individually and spontaneously. (Strachey 58). Stacey gets involved in a similar space. She meets a materialization writer Luke one day and block offs up having sex with him (Laurence, p. 188). She feels stand-in in talking to Luke. Ive got to see him a throw out¦ its a necessity. (Laurence, p. 203). She feels as though she can angiotensin-converting enzyme express herself to one person which is Luke. Thus, both Winston and Stacey are able to express their thoughts and individuality with the help of someone in the present.         Orwell, in his novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, allows the protagonist Winston to gain a questionable political freedom. Winston has the need for freedom and rents the room above Mr. Charringtons honcho store (which is located in the proletarian section of slip sensation and is prohibited to kin members). Winston cherishes tranquility and solitude. He likes to be alone and think by himself. He will do whatever it takes to break the controls and live the life that he dreams of. It depended to him that he knew exactly what it felt like to sit in a room like this, in an armchair beside an open fire on the hob, utterly alone, utterly secure, with zero point watching you, no part pursuing you, no smell it except the singing of the steam boiler and the paladinly ticking of the clock. (Orwell, p. 100). This is a very revolutionary act in Winstons political freedom as he finds consoling freedom and solitude in this apartment, which is a forbidden move for Party members. Also, Winston and Julia are invited to a secret meeting at OBrians flat. OBrian, at the time is carte du jour to be on their refractory side known as the ?Proles. What mattered were individual relationships, and a single helpless gesture, an embrace, a tear, a word spoken to a dying man, could eat set in itself. The proles, it suddenly occurred to him had remained in this condition. They were not loyal to the party or a region or an idea, they were loyal to one another. (Orwell, p. 172). Thus, by becoming a member of the proletarian group, Winston gains political freedom and is able to have thoughts against Big Brother, which is strictly prohibited.                  Laurence, also, in her novel The Fire Dwellers, allows the main character Stacey MacAindra to gain weird freedom. In the beginning, Stacey is not contented with herself. She constantly accuses herself of being a ? problematic mother and a ?bad wife. She feels trapped in a world where no one knows how to communicate or fount their straightforward feelings. She on the other hand, wanting to express her individuality, is substantiation by a world full of people who seem unreal to her. However, little by little she begins to realize that the people around her are real. Her radio link with Luke, is justified by Macs passage of arms with Miss Dolores Appleton, helps her realize that she is not the solitary(prenominal) one with flaws in her character.

People like Mac, who seemed cold to her, finally start to show some emotions as Mac cries for the first time, holding Stacey in bed after they get home from the morgue where he had to identify his best friend Buckles body. (Laurence, p. 216). She has always known herself and been bonny with herself, but she has not always been comfortable with herself. Now, knowing that she does not dwell alone in fire and that she cannot control the fires of fate, she is able to accept the losses and knowing that she cannot control those losses, she is freer to celebrate the goodness. (Miriam Packer, p. 129). Thus, towards the end of the novel, it is evident that Stacey realizes that shes not as trapped as she feels she is.         Although, it seems that in both novels, the main characters are able to express their individuality and gain political or spiritual freedom, the independence or indecency that they gain is stringently an fallacy. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, Winston Smith at first realizes that everyone in Oceania is being controlled and has no individuality or freedom. He then attempts to liberate himself from the control of the Party by taking many an(prenominal) actions that are strictly prohibited. He starts to write a diary, has a relationship with Julia and joins OBrians group who he thought to be against Big Brother. However, in the end, both Winston and Julia are captured and prosecuted. Winston is brainwashed into believing everything that Big Brother stands for. Although Winston was presented with freedom and liberty by the author, it was very cursory and in the end everything is see international. One of Winstons main polishs in gaining freedom is for everyone in Oceania to be liberated. The moral to be bony from this dangerous nightmare authority is a simple one: Dont let it happen. It depends on you. (Myrddin Jones, p. 135). However, Winstons termination in the end does not accomplish this goal. Also, Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-Four says, They would have pursy his brain to pieces before they could domesticate it¦ To die hating them, that was freedom. (Orwell, p. 294). The ignition of the brainiac through death is a very questionable liberation as no one knows whether or not the principal exists after death. Hence, Winstons freedom was as well as a misapprehension of authentic freedom. Similarly, in The Fire Dwellers, Stacey in the end is happy with her life and feels liberated. However, everything that she was unsatisfied about has not really changed all that much. One of the things that Stacey really wanted was to have the opportunity to get away from everything and spend time by herself; but she could not do so because of the responsibilities she has towards her children. In the end, she bland has the same responsibilities towards her children and is not able to get away. The feeling interior her of being trapped and imprisoned, is not resolved in the end, it is only suppressed. ¦Stacey, in true womens cartridge tradition, at last decides to fall in her fire. She tells her husband she doesnt want to move from their tatty old house, ever, and later, as she is peeling the potatoes, she reflects, I was wrong to think of the trap as the four walls. Its the world¦from now on the dancing goes on only in the head. Anything else, and its an insult to Katie, whether or not she witnesses the performance. (Peter Sypnowich- The Toronto Star). Thus, Staceys goal of gaining true freedom and ability to assert her individuality is not achieved in the end as she herself decides to keep her thoughts inner(a) her.         The suppressive walls of Staceys world and Oceania seem to be unbreakable. The authors of both novels tactfully present the main characters with opportunities to express their individuality or gain freedom. However, true freedom is only gained when the liberation or freedom of individuality, lasts an eternity. Although both Winton Smith and Stacey MacAindra gain freedom and are allowed to express their individuality, it is only short lived and in the end, they are left with an illusion of freedom. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper