nationalist ACT : DEFENSE OR DESTRUCTION2007 Today , we homecoming an essential step in defeating act of terrorism while make prisoner dear the constitutional rights of each(prenominal) Americans - President George Bush (Olsen , 2001 Many aspects of the circuit gameboard increase the opportunity for law enforcement and the intelligence community to hold to an era where they monitored and rough sequences harassed individuals who were merely exercising their first off Amendment rights . Nothing that occurred on folk 11 mandates that we return to such an era - John Podesta , White House Chief of staff (1998-2001 (The the States nationalist r come onine , 2006Above is just a mild representative of the spirited debate surrounding theAmerican government activity s moot PATRIOT Act . In the wake of September 11 , debat esab come in the surety of America flamed anew . Many individuals argued that certain sacrifices werenecessary in to make the United States a safer place to live Others contended that noamount of security was worth sacrificing the basic principles on which America was foundedfreedom and equality for all . Amidst the challenges , a sweeping turn on was drafted which wouldsignificantly amend 15 subsisting laws and which would implement several controversial measures (Summary of the States patriot Act , 2002 . Attorney General John Ashcroft scorn warningsfrom opposing members of relation back , urged Congress to hastily paseo the controversial bill . If nothe warned , deuced for imminent terrorist attacks would fall at the feet of Congress . On October26 , 2001 , the junction and Streng thereforeing America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required toIntercept and memorise Terrorism Act of 2001 - aka the USA PATRIOT Act - was write intolaw by President George W . Bush (The U SA Patriot Act , 2006 . Only 66 members of C! ongressvoted against the bill , many demented that the act violated some basic civil rights (Olsen , 2001Has the PATRIOT Act fulfilled its promises , or validated its criticsCriminal and intelligence agencies capture along the measures implemented by the act asbreakthroughs in the fight against miserable offense and terrorism .
First , they say technology demandsthat control laws be updated to intromit electronic equipment . If terrorists now r break throughinely usecell phones and e-mails to carry out their activities , then the intelligence agencies hands areaffectively tied if they halt no part to conduc t wire taps and such on electronic equipment (Eggen , 2003 . Patriot Act-approved technologies such as the roving knock and theCARNIVORE constitution (monitoring Internet activity ) allow sophisticated surveillance of theseadvanced technologies (Hulme , 2001Second , the Patriot Act imposes stiffer penalties for terrorist activities , and expands thelist of crimes leaded terrorist . For example , previous laws did not postulate activities such asproviding oral instructions on how to carry out an attack or providing financial backing toterrorists to be wrong offenses . As a result of the PATRIOT Act agencies call for much less redtape to wade through (saving valuable m ) in to establish probable cause (USAPATRIOT Act , 2006 . justice enforcement now also has more authority to prosecute hackers -cyber terrorists who could truly well represent the future of terrorism For the first...If you want to outfox a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want ! to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment