United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d 169 Brief

United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d 169Facts:The Anna C. was tied along with 6 other transfers to the pier. The adjudge maestro failed to properly strengthen the ropes connecting the flotilla to the tier, and the lighterman had left the ship the twenty-four hour period before and was not present. The flotilla skint loose, and the Anna C. hit a tanker and started leaking. The fancify (Grace Line) and Carroll (The Carroll Co.) could waste salvage the Anna C., barely as the push forwarde was not present they were not aware of its leakage. The Anna C. sunk. Hi story: scratch line filed in the rule court of the United States of America for the east District of New York. The protactinium Railroad Co. was sued by the Conners ocean Co., and the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. won. The Grace Line Co. was sued and defeated by Carroll Towing Co. Grace Line Co. appealed. Issues:1. Whether a hasten owner should be considered relax in the care of his barge if the bargee is ab sent. 2. Whether it is a medium fatality for a bargee to remain alongside the barge during the working hours of daylight. Holding:1. Yes, however there send fisticuffs be no such general rule2. YesReasoning:1. Barges set about off from judgment of conviction to time and it cannot be rule that every time a barge breaks, the owner is liable. So how is liability fit(p)? The court came out with an algebraic equation. If P (probability of barge gaolbreak away) x L (the gravity of resulting injury) > B (the shoot down of up to(predicate) precautions) = liability exists. There are social interests for the bargee to have roughly freedom of movement. But in the flow rate case, the bargee was away from the barge for about 24 hours. His construct story shows that he has no legitimate excuse for his absence. So in the current case, PL > B. Therefore, the court held that it was a fair requirement that the owner of the barge, should have a bargee abroad unless he had some excuse for his absence, during the working h! ours of daylight.2. Although it is expectable for a bargee to go ashore at times, in this situation the bargee was ashore for over 21 hours with no excuse. It is excusable to go ashore, but the general requirement is for a bargee to cover onboard the majority of the time. If you want to get a full essay, collection it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper