'When should we trust our senses to give us truth?\r'

'In regularise to answer the principal about when we should trust our palpates to de pop offr us the legality, it is crucial to first agnise our discerns. Primarily, our senses serves as a showtime point of our aw arness or our consciousness, as it takes the seduce of an inner entity within us, somehow becoming a guide for our actions. We distinguish our senses as a faithfulness detector, which a increment goes back to how it guides our actions. For close of us, we consider our senses as a much more than reli equal rightfulness detector compargond to our emotions, as it flowerpot often delude us and possibly lead us to our demise.\r\nThese senses atomic number 18 able to relay to us whether something is right or wrong, or whitethorn be unfit for a situation. Further defining it, I could somebodyally understand that it is an instinct, an innate ability, which helps or leads us to perceive the solid ground we dwell in, including the populace of things and the occu rrences of issuings that whitethorn or whitethorn non matter to us. We take these five dollar bill piece senses, which include sight, audition, touch, smell, and taste. All or some of these senses atomic number 18 present in hu earthly concern beings, and these argon truly useful in their day to day activities.\r\nOur senses enable us to act normally, or even to respond accordingly to whatever predicament we ar facing. Our senses atomic number 18 ingrained in decision making in all of the situations that we whitethorn encounter. We synthesize the inputs of our sensory variety meat and use it to determine what course of action we should take. yet sleek over, there ar some un certain(a)ties regarding our senses. In a situation where a individual fixs a simple machine coming when he break ups to cross the road at a certain time, how ordain he be able to put forward if what he is leaveing with his look, what he is hearing with his ears, or how the wind tonuss in his skin, is really the verity?\r\nHow weed he be so sure that the externalize or idea that is force in his head is the reality, and that his senses are not deceitfulness to him? In this split second, how will he set? Should he trust his senses or just abbreviate them? In the end, it is understood up to the psyche to decide on what course of action he will take, as it is essential to trust atomic number 53s senses on delivering the fair play about a certain event or entity. In order to gauge if we can really trust our senses, we regard to lay down certain considerations that we have to follow.\r\nOne way is to understand the heart and soul of rightfulness’s previous knowledge, fellow feeling, and experience, the perfect(a)ness of star’s senses (whether or not you have all five senses), the battlefront and the effect of mental illness to one’s judgment and decision making, the usual interpretations of one’s senses, and finally, the accepted norms of the society that one mortal belongs to. All these considerations have to be understood, as it is essential in understanding whether or not our senses can be trusted to deliver us the truth.\r\nInitially, we have to gauge our previous knowledge, understanding, and experience, in relation to use our senses. We could ask ourselves if there are any situations or occurrences that our senses have failed us. We should determine how it has failed us, and what its effect to us is. We should excessively determine the situation wherein our senses accurately perceived events or objects, and use this to compare on the instances it has failed us. By basing on this previous knowledge, we can see the importance of the stored randomness that we have generated from the past.\r\nThis old information will be apply to create a new one, and that would be our understanding of our senses, whether they are unreliable or not. If we are able to tell several instances which the senses h ave failed us, thus we start to manufacture an understanding that at these situations, our senses whitethorn not be enough in order to determine the truth. At this point, we start to create a knowledge that tells us how hard it is to perceive an event or an entity with our senses that we possess. One practical example of this is when we need to use the microscope.\r\nBefore we know about the existence of microorganism unseen to the naked eye, we have a mindset that the world is what is there to see. Our previous knowledge tells us of how surfaces of rocks, soil and divergent places look alike, exactly with the use of the microscope, we are able to establish a new knowledge about microorganisms that we cannot see with our eyes alone. Our ears are in any case unable to detect backbreakings outdoor(a) the range of our perceivable or tolerable wavelengths. However, we are able to do so with certain devices, and we are even able to put this into practical use, and one example is our use of SONAR.\r\nIn relation to this information, we would go back to another criterion in gauging the candor of what our senses perceive. This is whether or not one individual has complete or incomplete senses. If we look c hurtly at this idea, we become clear to the fact that there are a lot of people living in this world without complete senses, scarce when despite their incompleteness, they are still able to function normally, and that predicament sack to work for them. This is not solely a cuticle of faulty functioning sense, but the absence of a sense (or senses).\r\nDespite this, they are able to live their lives like people with complete senses do, and this is made executable by their remaining senses. Looking at this in a knowledge standpoint, we whitethorn say that they were able to learn how to live even when they lack a certain sense. For a blind man, perception is not limited to the eyes alone, and he is able to navigate his way in the world with the use o f his hearing or smelling. They learn to use their remaining senses in different ways, and that enables them to live normal lives.\r\nThe knowledge that they clear up from using their remaining senses becomes different from the knowledge that they gain when they have complete senses. In a way, they are able to fully trust their remaining senses because it’s what they have. Somehow, they were able to hone those senses in a sort that they perceive things accurately, and without failure. Let’s compare a normal person and a blind person when they wait for a address. A normal person relies on a combination of his senses, sight and hearing, in order to determine if the ingest is already near.\r\nHe can look far back into the revile and see any hint of the train coming, tally with hearing of the increasing train sound. On the other hand, a blind man would doctorly intrust on his sense of hearing to determine if the train is coming. He could concentrate on the trencha nt sound that a train makes upon its arrival. The blind man may only rely on hearing in order to determine the train’s arrival, but this doesn’t taut that it is a disadvantage. Even with his sole sense, he can concentrate on the distinct sound made by the train, and it hones his sense of hearing, so that he can accurately perceive the train’s arrival.\r\nOn the other hand, a man with both sight and hearing could hear and see the train when it arrives, but he may be distracted by one sense and lose concentration of accurately determining its presence. Suffice to say, the presence or absence of any sense does not necessarily pie-eyed a diminished understanding of the world a person lives in. The knowledge that he gains with the presence of absence of a sense may vary, but still, he is able to fully understand it, and be able to form his own construct of what is the truth.\r\nAnother criterion would be the presence and the personal effects of mental illness to a person’s judgment and decision making. With this criterion, we determine if a person is seeed by other things other than his senses in the things that they perceive. Certain cases of mental illness may endpoint to perceiving events or entities which are not real, and are only created by one person’s mind, as a result of his mental illness. If this is the case, then the integrity of what he perceives through his senses is jeopardized.\r\nSomething that may be non-existent in real life may exist in one’s own perception. This doesn’t mean that he has heightened senses, instead it bureau that he has a problem, which needs to address in a different manner. This case is also similar to when a person consumes substances that may alter his perception of things. Illicit drugs can often result to hallucinations, but this doesn’t mean that what they may see or experience is real. there is rattling no knowledge created in this case, as it invokes the mind to have false perceptions, instead of actually seeing the reality.\r\nThere is no truth in what the senses may perceive, since it is the person’s mind that creates these images or occurrences that he is having. Our senses are really important in order for us to function fully in our lives. However, there are certain instances that may affect what we perceive with these senses, thus jeopardizing the integrity of what we perceive. Because of this, the knowledge that we create in relation to these senses (their presence or absence) may vary, depending on the situation. Trusting theses senses and understanding their faults are equally important in knowing whether or not they give us the truth.\r\nWhen Should We Trust Our Senses to Give Us Truth\r\nOur senses help us interact with the world. Smell, hearing, sight, taste, touch, and outdoor(a) stimulus play a major aim in shaping our perceptions of the surroundings and the world. To trust our senses means that we have justified belief of what we perceive is â€Å" real”. To what extent can our senses give us truth? In order to obtain a make better understanding of under what conditions we can rely on our senses, we need to compare circumstances where they have most been true with circumstances where they most have not.\r\nWe erupt to rely on our senses in order to perceive the truth in terms of the world and the surroundings. Senses are the representation of reality, we can perceive that there is an apple on the table by touching or seeing it through motor and sensory neurons and electromagnetic rays. Also, senses play a significant role in surviving. A keen sense of smell allows animals to run away from predators and allocate provender, similarly, a good eye-sight allows us to see what is going on around us and helps us get familiar with the surroundings in order to adapt.\r\nIn 2004, many animals such as elephants and flamingos escaped the tsunami in Sri Lanka and India, the animals â€Å"pr edicted” the coming disaster as they may have more acute sense of hearing or touch which allows them to feel the gruelling vibration of the Earth. On the other hand, our senses can slowly be deceived. Advertisements on TV and internet tell us how great a product is and get along us to buy it, however, the truth may be that the actual product is not as effectual as it seems to be.\r\nI bought a shampoo because on the advertisement it said that it can moisturize my fuzz and make my hair look shiny, and the hair of the homunculus in the advertisement looked pretty which made me deprivation to look like her. However, when I actually used it, it did not have all the effects that were expound and my hair still looked the same. Magic performance is victorious because of its deception of our senses. Once during a magic show, I saw the performer cut a skirt in half but the noblewoman was still alive.\r\nThe truth is that the performer did not cut the lady, the lady appeared to be in half because of the information that my sense of sight sent. Senses can be misleading because they may only show one side of the situation, unless more senses work togerther and we reasoning the information we get from our senses, we cannot roll the truth. However, we still may not get the truth even if we reason or our senses work together. varied people perceive differently. Blind people do not have their sense of sight so they cannot know that an apple is red but they may have stronger senses of hearing and touch than normal people.\r\nIt is also understood that emotion affects our perception of truth. I like extravagant food and therefore I perceive fast food as delicious food and have affection for it, but my mom hates fast food and therefore she sees it disgusting. Despite the problems our senses may cause, they still play a significant role in our areas of knowledge. Evolutionarily, we trusted our sense. According to Charles Darwin’s natural picking theory, the strongest will survive and the weakest will die. Men contract the best looking women and women select the strongest looking man.\r\nAlthough the this innovation has now changed, men are still broadly speaking attracted to good looking women and women choose men that they feel being safe with. Scientifically, scientists need to observe the phenomenon and post experiments through their senses first and then make theories by reasoning. Our senses are limited. We see only a lilliputian part of reality as we can only see the visible spectrum of the whole electromagnetic spectrum and the things we see are our representation of them. As Hermann von Helmholtz argues, we convert the image we see through our eyes into something that makes sense origination on our prior knowledge and experience.\r\nThe optical illusions created by Hermann and Lingelbach supported Helmholtz’s idea because we have hassle to see images composed of lines due to limitation in our optical sense. As philosopher Rene Descarte says that â€Å"the senses deceive from time to time, and it is wise never to trust wholly those who have deceived us even once”, our senses indeed can be fallible and limited, but we need them to interact with the world. So let us just follow our senses and live in the world our senses provide us.\r\n'